Schools adopt random student drug testing to decrease drug misuse and illicit drug use among students. The vendor arrives at school with test kits depending on the number of students chosen that day.
Some studies indicate that it can serve as a deterrent and prevent substance abuse, while other research shows it has little to no impact, Feinstein says.
Students can outsmart their testers and find ways of cheating the tests. Even using the cheapest screening test the whole procedure can be costly for schools, especially as frequent testing increases a potential deterrent effect of testing. The stated goal of such programs is to identify students with possible substance abuse issues and to intervene early.
There are additional concerns about privacy, whether screeners are looking for the right drugs with the tests they use, and the harmful ways children might try to get around the screens. If a student tests positive for drugs, should that student face disciplinary consequences?
Bush's State of the Union Address suggested that a governmental role in promoting personal responsibility for choices would have an impact on inappropriate drug use in the population. Drug testing was responsible for a significant reduction in cigarette smoking among 8th grade students year-olds from Key Findings on Adolescent Drug Use.
Only the student, parents and administrators are notified of the positive test. At present there is little evidence that random testing in schools prevents drug use in those that have not started or deters those already engaged in drug taking.
Alone, random testing will not identify all those young people who may benefit from early identification and supportive intervention. Illicit drug use is certainly prevalent among the young.
Most teens do not use illicit drugs, but for those who do, it can lead to a wide range of adverse effects on their behavior and health. Nonetheless, reports that have found a reduced prevalence of drug use have found that students who were drug tested and those who were not reported had equal interest in experimenting with drugs in the future.
Pediatricians Say No to Random Drug Testing in Schools Written by David Heitz on March 30, As stories about teenagers hooked on painkillers and even heroin increasingly make their way into our news feeds, authorities are scrambling for ways to head off the abuse.
Student drug testing and positive school climates: The academy also notes that school-based testing can cause modest, short-term decreases in substance abuse, but no evidence exists of lasting prevention.
Many drug-using students are aware of techniques that supposedly detoxify their systems or mask their drug use. Clinical use of urine drug screening.
Lacey Township School District in New Jersey has extended its high school drug-testing policy to seventh- and eighth-graders. Welcome to The Buzz—Center on Addiction's online conversation about addiction and substance use.
Opponents of student drug testing, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, argue that testing in school does not get to the root of addiction and overdoses, and that its effectiveness is inconclusive.
According to Counsel and Heal, approximately 20 percent of high schools in the United States utilize drug testing, usually to screen students participating in sports or after-school clubs.
Supreme Court said student drug testing for adolescents in competitive extracurricular activities is constitutional, does that mean it is legal in my city or state? She stressed drug testing children requires a rigid protocol to insure accuracy, and that can be very expensive.
The study found no impact of random drug testing reported by students not participating in testing on the intention to use substances, the perceived consequences of substance use, participation in activities subject to drug testing, or school connectedness.The Effectiveness of Mandatory-Random Student Drug Testing.
Students involved in extracurricular activities and subject to in-school drug testing reported less substance use than comparable students in high schools without drug testing, according to a new evaluation released today by the Institute of Education Sciences.
ANCD research paper 16 Drug testing in schools evidence, impacts and alternatives. National Centre for Education and Training on Addiction Ann M. Roche Ken Pidd Petra Bywood Vinita Duraisingam Alternatives to school drug testing.
8 Alternatives to drug. Discover librarian-selected research resources on Drug Testing in Schools from the Questia online library, including full-text online books, academic journals, magazines, newspapers and more.
and trafficking. Drug testing in the workplace has been a controversial measure, weighing productivity and the safety of the workers and those.
Research regarding the effectiveness of random drug testing of students at school is scarce and inconsistent, says Emily Feinstein, director of health law and policy at The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. Mar 06, · Schools adopt random student drug testing to decrease drug misuse and illicit drug use among students.
First, they hope random testing will serve as a deterrent and give students a reason to resist peer pressure to take drugs. Jul 01, · The only systematic study of random drug testing in schools failed to find an impact.
8 In this study of 76 8th, Foundation, noted the concern at the development of drug testing programmes on the ‘basis of the slimmest available research evidence’.